
Zvamaida Murwira Senior Reporter—-
The National Social Security Authority is in the eye of a storm after it lost over US$11,2 million worth of property which was repossessed by local authorities over non-development, prejudicing pensioners’ money in the process. It also emerged that the authority lent US$2,7million in unsecured housing loans to employees while some board members were sitting on about 17 other firms, among other irregularities.
In her report covering 2012, but made available recently, the Comptroller and Auditor General, Ms Mildred Chiri, noted that some executive directors were being paid bonuses bi-annually for representing the authority in organisations where the authority had 10 percent stake, in addition to the normal representation allowances they get monthly.
It was also noted that the authority terminated an incomplete computerisation project on which it had spent US$2,2million citing non-performance by the contractor, thereby sinking pensioners’ money.
Parliament’s Public Accounts portfolio committee is now seized with the matter and has since invited NSSA general manager Mr James Matiza to explain the irregularities next week together with secretary of Public Service, Labour and Social Services, Mr Ngoni Masoka.
Mr Masoka is performing the functions of the board following the expiry of the Innocent Chagonda-led board in August last year.
On board members, Ms Chiri observed that four out of nine board members were sitting on several boards in violation of Corporate Governance Framework for State Enterprises and Parastatal, which forbid one from sitting on more than two boards.
“It was observed that board members were members of other boards and their membership including that of NSSA varied between three to 17. Conflict of interest could arise due to cross directorship and effectiveness of board members may be compromised due to multi-directorships,” she said.
On unsecured housing loans to 35 employees, Ms Chiri said NSSA violated its own policy which stipulated that the authority should keep title deeds until the employee fully paid back the loan.
“Some of the employees who benefitted from this scheme do not have title deeds of the properties as they have been acquired through cessions, which can not be used as security by NSSA. There were instances where employees who owe NSSA unsecured housing loans resign before settlement,” said Ms Chiri.
On the loss of properties to local authorities for failure to develop, Ms Chiri noted that NSSA lost stands in Masvingo, Rusape, Victoria Falls, Mutare and Pumula South with the highest loss registered in Mutare where it lost property worth US$8million at Fernhill and Gimboki.
“When property that has been paid for is repossessed, the authority loses pensioners’ funds through unfulfilled investments,” she said.
“Management should de-recognise these properties from the authorities’ financial statements until they regain title.
On the termination of computerisation system, the authority lost US$2,2million as the project cost US$1million while US$1,2 million was to cover damages awarded by an arbitrator for contractual damages.
“The risk here is that the authority incurs huge financial losses by engaging in unfulfilled projects whose returns will never be realised. Failure to pay meaningful pension payouts to pensioners as a result of these financial losses may expose NSSA to reputational risk,” said Ms Chiri.
On bonuses to executive directors, it was noted that bonus was paid in addition to normal representation monthly allowances.
“During the year under review, they were paid a total of US$59 091.67 which constitutes 100 percent of the board fees generated on behalf of NSSA employees as part of their job. Financial loss through double payment as the authority is paying executive directors sitting allowances while they are executing part of their normal day to day duties,” said Ms Chiri.
Ms Chiri also noted that the Policy and Procedures manual, which was not approved by the board stipulated that the general manager could buy US$500 000 per counter per day with the investment director able to buy US$250 000 per counter per day on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange.
This, she said translated to US$18,7 million in respect of the investment director per day while for the general manager that would translate to US$37,5 million per day considering that there are 75 listed companies on the ZSE.
“The Policy and Procedure manual is mute on what exact procedures should be followed in cases where an investment has to be made in a private company or other similar unusual investment transactions. The Policy and Procedure manual is silent on the types of financial instruments which the authority can invest in and those that it may not,” she said.
NSSA announced last year that it would write off over US$30 million it invested in Capital Bank, as the bank wound its operations.
NSSA, the 86 percent shareholder in Capital Bank, has also authorised the sale of the bank’s 21 percent stake in First Mutual Life with proceeds being used to partly pay off depositors.
But even writing off US$30 million, the authority said it had accrued more benefits than what it invested through Capital Bank-linked investments.
NSSA is benefiting from the insurance business under First Mutual Life which it acquired through Capital Bank, former Renaissance Merchant Bank, and its subsidiary, Pearl Properties
Source: Herald